Melissa - A Macro Virus
|

|
|
|
Melissa-- A New Menace for Microsoft Product Users:
A Word and a Outlook Macro Virus
Edited by Dr. Raj Mehta Information Supplied by Peter Doshi and Bruce Gingery
``Melissa'' is a virus which has caught a lot of attention
since last Friday. It is believed to become so pervasive
that the FBI has even issued a warning about it, which no
doubt, will get a lot of media attention. This is a first.
In USA, they believe it WILL become a very serious problem by
Monday i.e. our Monday Night, when US returns to work. I don't think the problem will be far behind in making its appearance in India.
``Melissa'', aka W97M_Melissa, a Macro virus uses a combination
of MS Word and Outlook macros to grab a users's address
book list and send out a list of 80 porn sites to all
those people... automatically. As it's all automated and
done without user intervention, the rate of propagation is
alarming. On the brighter side, the virus doesn't seem
to have any destructive attributes, such as corrupting your
data and files. But, given the amount of email this can
generate, it's likely (and already has) shut down email
systems.
Even if you don't use MS Outlook for email, your computer
can still become infected. One of the identified properties
of this virus is to lower the system security setting,
making it easier to change system properties. Additionally,
it is known that the virus infects the `Normal.dot' file,
a special template file used when creating any new Word
document. When that document is then emailed, the virus
will spread, with the sender completely unknowing. When
the file is received and opened, *unpatched* (see reference
on bottom for a patch) versions of Word97 will automatically
run the embedded Macro without warning.
Many sites on the net are publishing warning of being
careful when receiving an email with a given subject,
"Important Message from ", or with a given
filename, LIST.DOC. DO NOT make the mistake of thinking
that ONLY an email with those properties may contain the
virus. That is not the case, as described in the scenario
above.
|